Currently Empty: ₹0.00
Manual Testing
What is Manual Testing?
Manual testing is a process in which testers manually execute test cases without using any automation tools. The primary goal is to identify bugs or defects in software to ensure it meets the specified requirements. It involves checking the functionality, usability, and consistency of the application by simulating real-user scenarios. Unlike automated testing, manual testing relies on the tester’s insight, experience, and attention to detail.
Manual testing is best suited for exploratory testing, usability testing, and ad-hoc testing—scenarios that require human observation and flexibility. During manual testing, testers use various artifacts like test plans, test cases, and bug reports. The tester plays a key role in validating both the user interface (UI) and user experience (UX) of the software.
It is especially useful in the early stages of development when automation is not feasible, or when the application is unstable. Though it is time-consuming and can be repetitive, manual testing is cost-effective for small-scale projects or short-term tasks. However, for larger projects, it is often used in combination with automation testing.
In summary, manual testing remains a fundamental aspect of quality assurance. It helps detect issues that automation may overlook and ensures the final product delivers a reliable and smooth experience to end users.
Manual testing consists of various testing types, each serving a unique purpose during the software development life cycle. Understanding these types helps testers choose the right approach depending on the project needs, complexity, and phase of development. Below are the most common types of manual testing:
1. Black Box Testing
In black box testing, testers do not need to know the internal workings of the software. They focus solely on the inputs and expected outputs based on requirements. It’s commonly used to validate functionality without diving into code structure.
2. White Box Testing
Although more technical and typically handled by developers, white box testing can also be done manually. It involves understanding and testing the internal logic, structure, and code of the application. It’s useful for checking loops, conditions, and error-handling mechanisms.
3. Smoke Testing
Smoke testing is a quick, shallow check to see if the major functionalities of the software are working after a new build. It’s often called a “build verification test.” If the build fails smoke testing, it’s sent back for fixes.
4. Sanity Testing
Sanity testing is a focused check performed after bug fixes or minor changes. Unlike smoke testing, it is more narrow in scope and ensures specific functionalities are still working correctly.
5. Regression Testing
This type of testing ensures that recent changes or enhancements have not negatively affected existing functionalities. It is critical in iterative development where frequent updates occur.
6. Exploratory Testing
In exploratory testing, testers actively explore the software without pre-written test cases. This method relies on the tester’s domain knowledge, creativity, and intuition.
7. Ad-Hoc Testing
Ad-hoc testing is informal and unstructured. Testers attempt to “break” the system by using random inputs and unexpected actions, often uncovering rare bugs.
Each type adds value in different scenarios. A well-rounded manual testing process typically includes a mix of these types to ensure comprehensive coverage.
Manual Testing Life Cycle
The Manual Testing Life Cycle refers to the structured process followed to conduct manual testing effectively. It ensures that all testing activities are planned, executed, and closed systematically. The cycle usually consists of the following phases:
1. Requirement Analysis – In this phase, testers study the requirements documents to understand what needs to be tested. This helps identify testable features and areas of focus.
2. Test Planning – A test plan is created outlining the scope, objectives, resources, tools (if any), risks, and schedule of the testing process.
3. Test Case Design – Testers write detailed test cases with clear steps, input data, and expected results. These cases ensure consistent testing across different environments and team members.
4. Test Environment Setup – Before executing tests, a proper test environment (hardware, software, network, etc.) must be prepared to mirror the production setup as closely as possible.
5. Test Execution – During this phase, testers manually execute the test cases and log the actual results. If discrepancies are found, they report bugs to the development team.
6. Defect Tracking and Reporting – Bugs are tracked using tools like Jira or Bugzilla. Testers retest once fixes are applied.
7. Test Closure – After all test cases are executed and defects are resolved, a test summary report is prepared. Lessons learned and metrics are reviewed for future improvement.
This life cycle ensures consistency, accountability, and quality throughout the manual testing process.
Test Case Design in Manual Testing
Test case design is one of the most important tasks in manual testing. A test case is a detailed set of steps that guides the tester on how to validate a specific feature or functionality in the application. Each test case includes inputs, execution conditions, expected results, and actual outcomes. Well-designed test cases ensure thorough coverage of the application and make testing more effective and repeatable.
In manual testing, test cases are typically created during the test design phase, after analyzing the requirements. A good test case is clear, concise, and covers both positive and negative scenarios. It should also be traceable back to the requirement it validates. For instance, if a login feature allows only valid credentials, your test case should verify login success, failure for invalid data, and behavior when fields are left empty.
There are different test design techniques, such as:
Equivalence Partitioning: Divides input data into valid and invalid partitions.
Boundary Value Analysis: Focuses on values at the edge of valid input ranges.
Decision Table Testing: Helps cover combinations of inputs and their expected outcomes.
Manual testers also often include preconditions, test data, and clean-up steps in their test cases. This ensures consistency in execution, especially in teams. A well-maintained test case repository helps in regression testing and maintaining software quality over time.
Proper test case design leads to better defect detection, minimizes oversight, and ensures higher confidence in software reliability. It’s an essential skill for every manual tester.
Test Plan in Manual Testing
A test plan is a comprehensive document that outlines the testing strategy, objectives, resources, schedule, scope, and deliverables of the testing process. It acts as a blueprint for the entire testing activity and helps the testing team align with business goals. In manual testing, the test plan ensures that testing is organized, measurable, and goal-driven.
The creation of a test plan typically starts after the requirement analysis phase. The test lead or QA manager is usually responsible for writing the test plan. It includes several key components:
Scope and Objectives: What will be tested and what won’t be tested.
Testing Types and Strategy: What types of testing will be performed and how (e.g., black box, smoke testing).
Resources and Roles: Who will perform the testing and what roles are assigned.
Schedule and Milestones: Timelines for test design, execution, and completion.
Tools and Environment: Details about the environment setup and any tools (even if minimal) used for test case management or bug tracking.
Risk and Mitigation: Any potential risks that may affect testing and how to handle them.
A test plan also serves as a communication tool between QA, development, and stakeholders. It keeps everyone informed about the testing process, priorities, and status.
For manual testers, a clear and well-structured test plan enhances productivity and reduces redundancy. It acts as a reference point throughout the project and is especially valuable in larger teams or long-term testing efforts.
Test Scenario vs Test Case in Manual Testing
In manual testing, test scenarios and test cases are fundamental concepts, but they serve different purposes. Understanding the difference helps testers structure their work better and ensures proper coverage of the application.
A test scenario is a high-level description of what to test. It focuses on a specific feature or functionality from an end-user perspective. For example, “Verify user can successfully log in with valid credentials” is a test scenario. It gives a broad overview of what needs validation but doesn’t include detailed steps.
A test case, on the other hand, is a detailed set of instructions to validate a particular aspect of the scenario. It includes preconditions, test steps, expected results, and actual results. For example, a test case for the login feature would specify input fields, the data to be entered, buttons to be clicked, and what the expected behavior is after each action.
Here’s how they relate:
Test scenarios help identify what to test.
Test cases describe how to test.
Using both allows a structured and traceable testing process. Test scenarios help during brainstorming or exploratory testing, while test cases ensure consistency during execution, especially across teams.
For manual testers, maintaining a balance is key. Too many test cases can become hard to manage, while too few may result in missed bugs. Hence, scenarios give coverage assurance, and cases give execution reliability.
Exploratory Testing
Exploratory testing is an informal, experience-based testing approach where testers actively explore the application to identify defects without predefined test cases. Instead of following scripted steps, testers rely on their intuition, creativity, and domain knowledge to discover bugs.
This type of testing is especially useful when there’s limited documentation, tight timelines, or when testers want to understand an unfamiliar application. It’s commonly used in Agile environments where rapid changes occur frequently.
The main goal of exploratory testing is to learn how the system behaves through investigation. Testers analyze, design, and execute tests simultaneously, observing results and adjusting their next steps accordingly. This adaptive nature allows testers to uncover unexpected or hidden issues that scripted testing might miss.
Exploratory testing is often performed in sessions called Session-Based Test Management (SBTM). Testers plan short time-boxed sessions with a charter, such as “Explore the search feature with invalid inputs.” Notes, observations, and defects are recorded during the session.
This approach is also valuable for UI/UX validation since human testers can notice alignment issues, unexpected behavior, or confusing navigation. While it’s not a replacement for formal testing, it adds a creative layer to the QA process.
In short, exploratory testing helps discover high-impact bugs quickly, especially in critical or complex areas of the software.
Ad-Hoc Testing
Ad-hoc testing is an informal and unstructured type of manual testing performed without planning or documentation. The goal is to identify defects through random or unexpected actions. It is typically conducted when testers have deep familiarity with the application and can rely on intuition to try unpredictable test paths.
Unlike structured testing, where test cases are followed step by step, ad-hoc testing is about “breaking the system.” Testers often simulate unusual user behavior, such as entering special characters, rapidly switching screens, or submitting empty forms to observe how the software responds.
Although ad-hoc testing may seem chaotic, it often uncovers edge-case bugs that structured testing might overlook. It’s best suited for situations like:
Last-minute checks before a release
When time constraints prevent full regression testing
Verifying bug fixes in a flexible way
To be effective, ad-hoc testing requires testers with deep product knowledge. Some teams use tools like checklists or mind maps to guide this testing informally while still giving it some structure.
One common variation of ad-hoc testing is Monkey Testing, where the tester interacts with the application at random to see if it crashes.
While ad-hoc testing is valuable, it should not replace structured testing. Instead, it should complement it by identifying bugs in scenarios not covered by test cases. It adds an element of unpredictability and helps ensure the application is stable under real-world usage.
Regression Testing in Manual Testing
Regression testing is the process of re-executing previously completed test cases to ensure that recent changes haven’t negatively impacted the existing functionality. In manual testing, this involves identifying affected modules, re-running key test cases, and verifying that everything still works as expected.
Whenever a new feature is added, a bug is fixed, or code is updated, there’s a risk that the changes may unintentionally break existing functionality. Manual regression testing helps catch these issues before the software is released.
Since regression testing involves repeating the same tests, it can be time-consuming. However, in manual environments, prioritization is key. Testers often maintain a regression suite — a collection of important test cases that cover core business functionality and are re-executed with every release.
The main challenge with manual regression testing is efficiency. To address this, testers may apply a risk-based approach, focusing more on high-impact or high-risk areas. Exploratory regression testing may also be used to combine regression with unscripted testing for added depth.
Regression testing ensures that the quality of the software remains intact throughout development. It maintains confidence in the product, especially when it’s undergoing frequent changes, making it a critical part of every manual testing strategy.
Smoke testing and sanity testing are two types of quick checks performed in manual testing to validate application stability.
Smoke testing is a preliminary test conducted on a new build to check whether the critical functionalities are working. It acts like a “build verification test” to determine if the application is stable enough for more detailed testing. For example, if an app fails to load or the login page crashes, there’s no point in continuing deeper testing.
Sanity testing is a narrow and deep approach that focuses on specific features or bug fixes. After a minor change or patch, sanity testing ensures that the specific functionality works as intended and hasn’t introduced new bugs in the immediate area.
Both are quick and efficient:
Smoke testing = “Are the basics working?”
Sanity testing = “Did the fix work without breaking anything else?”
These tests are usually unscripted and done manually in early stages of testing cycles. While they don’t replace full regression or functional testing, they help save time and effort by catching major issues early.
The Defect Life Cycle, also known as the Bug Life Cycle, is a process that a defect goes through from its initial identification to its final resolution and closure. In manual testing, understanding this cycle is critical because it helps testers and developers manage, prioritize, and fix issues systematically.
1. Defect Identification
The defect life cycle begins when a tester identifies an issue while executing a test case. A defect is any deviation from the expected behavior, such as a broken button, incorrect output, UI misalignment, or a security flaw. The tester first reproduces the issue to ensure it’s not an isolated glitch.
2. Defect Logging
Once confirmed, the tester logs the defect using a defect tracking tool such as Jira, Bugzilla, or Mantis. The bug report should be detailed and clear. A well-written defect includes:
Title and description of the issue
Steps to reproduce
Actual vs. expected results
Severity and priority
Screenshots or logs (if applicable)
Environment details (browser, OS, build version, etc.)
Clear communication helps developers replicate and understand the issue quickly.
3. Defect Triage
In many organizations, a triage meeting is held where testers, developers, and project managers review the logged defects. During triage, they:
Validate if the defect is legitimate
Set the appropriate severity (impact on the system) and priority (urgency to fix)
Assign the defect to a developer
At this stage, the status of the defect is typically set to “Open” or “New.”
4. Defect Assignment and Fixing
The assigned developer investigates the defect. If it’s reproducible and valid, the status is changed to “Assigned.” The developer then fixes the defect and changes the status to “Fixed.”
Sometimes, a developer may mark the defect as “Invalid,” “Duplicate,” or “Won’t Fix” if:
The defect is not reproducible
It’s already reported
It’s not considered impactful enough to fix
5. Retesting
Once a defect is marked as “Fixed,” the tester re-executes the test to verify the issue is resolved. If the defect no longer occurs, it is marked as “Verified” or “Resolved.” However, if the issue still exists, the tester reopens the defect and sends it back for further analysis.
6. Closure
After successful verification, the status is changed to “Closed.” This indicates the defect is no longer active and has been resolved completely. Some organizations include a final review step or test lead approval before closing the defect.
Optional Statuses
Deferred: The defect is valid but will be fixed in a future release.
Rejected: The defect is considered invalid.
Cannot Reproduce: The tester’s steps don’t lead to the same error during re-testing.
Importance of the Defect Life Cycle
Managing the defect life cycle properly:
Improves communication between testers and developers
Increases traceability and transparency
Helps in tracking quality over time
Reduces risk of unresolved or lost defects
Every manual tester must understand the defect life cycle to ensure bugs are reported clearly, fixed efficiently, and closed properly. It is a crucial part of maintaining high software quality in any project.
In manual testing, understanding severity and priority is essential for managing defects effectively. Though often used together, they refer to different aspects of a bug: severity indicates the impact, while priority reflects the urgency of the fix.
Severity
Severity is defined as the extent to which a defect can affect the functioning of the software. It is usually assigned by the tester. A severe defect might break a major feature, prevent users from completing tasks, or cause system crashes. Severity levels include:
Critical: The application crashes or cannot continue. Example: The system fails to load the homepage.
High: Major functionality is broken, but the system is still running. Example: Payment processing fails.
Medium: A feature behaves incorrectly but has a workaround. Example: Sorting works incorrectly in a report.
Low: Cosmetic or minor defects that do not affect functionality. Example: A misspelled word on the UI.
Priority
Priority refers to how quickly a defect should be fixed. It is usually determined by the project manager or lead based on business needs and release timelines. Priority levels are:
High: Must be fixed immediately (often for business-critical functions).
Medium: Should be fixed in the normal development cycle.
Low: Can be fixed later; not urgent.
Examples
A login failure would have high severity and high priority — users cannot access the system, and it needs fixing immediately. A spelling mistake on a rarely seen screen could be low severity and low priority.
Sometimes, a defect may have low severity but high priority, such as a company logo missing from the homepage during a product launch. Conversely, a defect might have high severity but low priority, like a bug in a feature planned for future release.
Why It Matters
Helps development teams triage bugs efficiently.
Ensures critical bugs are not missed or delayed.
Supports better release planning and resource allocation.
Enhances communication between testers, developers, and business stakeholders.
In manual testing, properly categorizing severity and priority ensures that testing efforts align with business goals, improving both product quality and delivery timelines.
Functional testing is a type of manual testing that validates the software against its functional requirements. It ensures that each feature works according to the specification and delivers the expected output for a given input.
Purpose
The main goal of functional testing is to confirm that the software behaves as expected. This type of testing focuses on:
User interactions (like clicks, input, and navigation)
Business rules and logic
Data flow and validation
Integrations with other modules
For example, in a banking app, functional testing would check if:
A user can log in successfully
Transfers between accounts are calculated correctly
Incorrect inputs show relevant error messages
How It’s Done
In manual testing, functional testing is conducted by executing test cases derived from the system’s requirement specifications or user stories. Each test case includes:
Preconditions
Input data
Test steps
Expected results
Testers perform the actions manually, observe the system’s responses, and compare the actual output with the expected result.
Types of Functional Testing
Smoke Testing: Quick check to verify if the major functions are working.
Sanity Testing: Focused retesting after changes or fixes.
Integration Testing: Testing the interaction between modules.
System Testing: Verifying the entire application works together.
Regression Testing: Ensuring recent changes haven’t affected existing functions.
Benefits
Detects incorrect or missing functionalities early.
Improves user satisfaction by validating core features.
Reduces production bugs through thorough pre-release testing.
Challenges
Time-consuming when performed manually, especially for large systems.
Requires frequent updates to test cases when requirements change.
Functional testing remains a cornerstone of manual testing. Without it, there’s no assurance that the application will meet user expectations or business needs.
While functional testing checks what the system does, non-functional testing focuses on how the system performs under specific conditions. It evaluates aspects like performance, usability, reliability, and scalability.
Key Areas
Performance Testing: Measures how the system performs under load. In manual testing, testers simulate multiple users or heavy transactions to check for lags, timeouts, or slow response.
Usability Testing: Assesses how user-friendly the application is. Manual testers observe the design, navigation flow, button placements, error messages, and overall ease of use.
Compatibility Testing: Ensures the application works across different devices, browsers, and operating systems. Manual testers physically check the software on varied setups.
Security Testing: Checks how secure the system is from unauthorized access or data breaches. Manual testers may attempt invalid logins, data tampering, or session hijacking.
Why It Matters
Even if the software functions correctly, poor usability, slow load times, or compatibility issues can frustrate users. Non-functional testing ensures the application is not just working, but working well under real-world conditions.
Manual vs. Automated
While many non-functional tests (like performance) are better suited to automation, several aspects — especially usability and accessibility — benefit from human observation. Manual testers can detect problems automation might miss, such as confusing layouts or poorly labeled fields.
Process
Manual testers often follow:
Defined benchmarks (e.g., “Page load time should be under 3 seconds”)
User experience standards (e.g., “Forms must be usable with keyboard navigation”)
Compliance checks (e.g., ADA or WCAG for accessibility)
Challenges
Simulating real-world load or network conditions manually is difficult.
Requires a variety of devices and environments for full coverage.
Some tests (like security) need specialized skills.
Non-functional testing is essential to deliver a high-quality user experience. It complements functional testing by ensuring the system is efficient, user-friendly, and ready for diverse real-world conditions.
Black box testing is a manual testing technique where the tester evaluates the software without knowing its internal code, structure, or implementation. The focus is solely on inputs and expected outputs based on functional requirements.
In black box testing, the tester interacts with the software just like an end user. They provide inputs, trigger events, and observe the system’s outputs. The goal is to verify that the software behaves correctly from the outside, without any assumptions about how it works internally.
Key Features
Testers don’t need programming knowledge.
It validates the system’s functionality, not its implementation.
It’s ideal for functional testing at system or acceptance levels.
Types of Black Box Testing
Functional Testing: Checks features against requirements.
Regression Testing: Ensures unchanged parts still work after updates.
Boundary Value Testing: Tests limits of input fields (e.g., max/min values).
Equivalence Partitioning: Divides inputs into groups where behavior is expected to be the same.
Decision Table Testing: Tests combinations of inputs and expected outputs.
State Transition Testing: Tests how the system behaves in different states.
Example
Consider a login screen. In black box testing, the tester would:
Enter valid credentials and expect a dashboard.
Enter invalid credentials and expect an error.
Leave fields blank and expect validation messages.
They don’t need to know how the login function is coded — only what it’s supposed to do.
Advantages
Can be performed by testers without coding skills.
Helps detect missing functions or incorrect behavior.
Mimics user perspective closely.
Independent of system architecture.
Limitations
Doesn’t test the internal code or logic.
Some paths may remain untested if not covered by scenarios.
Debugging issues can be harder since the tester lacks internal knowledge.
In manual testing, black box testing is invaluable. It ensures that the application works as expected from a user’s point of view, which is ultimately what matters most.
White box testing is a technique where the tester has full knowledge of the application’s internal structure, logic, and source code. Unlike black box testing, this approach focuses on how the system is built rather than just how it behaves.
In white box testing, testers examine the internal operations of the software, such as code paths, branches, loops, and data flow. Although typically done by developers or technical testers, it can also be part of manual testing when testers use their understanding of code logic to design better tests.
Purpose
The primary aim is to:
Verify internal code logic.
Ensure all code paths are tested.
Identify hidden bugs or logic errors.
Techniques
Statement Coverage: Ensure every line of code is executed at least once.
Branch Coverage: Test all decision points (e.g., if-else paths).
Path Coverage: Examine all possible execution paths.
Loop Testing: Validate how the code handles loops — once, multiple times, or never.
Example
If a function adds two numbers only if both are positive, a white box tester would write cases to:
Add two positives (valid path)
Add a positive and a negative (skip path)
Add two negatives (ensure conditional branch is tested)
They know how the code is written, so their tests are based on covering logical structures.
Benefits
High coverage of logic and conditions.
Early detection of errors in development.
Optimizes code efficiency by identifying redundant or unreachable code.
Challenges
Requires programming knowledge.
Time-consuming for large applications.
Difficult to maintain if the codebase changes frequently.
Although white box testing is usually associated with automated unit testing, some aspects can be manually verified, especially during code reviews or while executing test cases aligned with internal code logic. For manual testers with technical knowledge, combining both black box and white box strategies can greatly enhance test coverage.
Usability testing is a type of manual testing focused on evaluating how user-friendly, efficient, and intuitive a software application is. This testing method is not about finding functional bugs, but rather about understanding the end-user experience — how easy it is for users to navigate, understand, and interact with the system.
The core goal of usability testing is to ensure that the application meets the expectations of its target audience. This type of testing typically involves real users performing specific tasks while observers monitor and record their actions, struggles, and feedback. Usability testing is crucial because even if a software product is technically flawless, poor usability can make it unsuccessful in the market.
Key Aspects of Usability Testing
There are several factors that are commonly evaluated during usability testing:
Ease of Learning: How quickly can a new user learn to use the software?
Efficiency of Use: Once the user is familiar with the software, how quickly can they perform tasks?
Memorability: After a period of not using the software, can users remember how to use it effectively?
Error Frequency and Severity: How often do users make errors? How severe are these errors, and how easily can users recover from them?
User Satisfaction: Is the user comfortable and satisfied while using the software?
Process of Usability Testing
Usability testing usually follows these steps:
Planning: Define the goals of the test, select the tasks to be tested, and identify the target user group.
Recruiting Participants: Select participants who resemble real users of the application.
Executing Test Sessions: Ask users to perform specific tasks while observers record their behavior, difficulties, and feedback.
Analyzing Results: Identify usability issues, patterns in user behavior, and areas for improvement.
Reporting Findings: Summarize issues and provide suggestions to improve the user experience.
Types of Usability Testing
Moderated Testing: A facilitator guides the participant through tasks and asks questions during the session.
Unmoderated Testing: Participants perform tasks on their own, often remotely.
Explorative Testing: Performed in the early stages to understand user needs and expectations.
Comparative Testing: Compares two or more designs to evaluate which is more user-friendly.
Tools Used in Usability Testing
Though it’s often manual, some tools can support usability testing:
Screen recording software (e.g., OBS Studio)
Click-tracking tools (e.g., Hotjar)
Session replay tools
Surveys and feedback forms
Benefits of Usability Testing
Improved customer satisfaction
Higher retention and conversion rates
Reduced development rework
Fewer customer support issues
Final Thoughts
Usability testing is one of the most important types of manual testing because it directly reflects how real users perceive the software. Even if all functional aspects work perfectly, a product with poor usability will fail to gain user trust or satisfaction. That’s why incorporating usability testing into the manual testing process is essential for delivering quality software.
Compatibility Testing is a type of non-functional manual testing used to ensure that a software application performs as expected across different devices, browsers, operating systems, network environments, and hardware configurations. It plays a critical role in verifying that your application is accessible and functional for a wide range of users, regardless of their platform or setup.
This testing becomes especially important for web and mobile applications, where users can access the software from numerous combinations of browsers, screen sizes, and OS versions. The aim is not to test features, but to test the behavior and rendering of the application in different environments.
Types of Compatibility Testing
Compatibility Testing can be broadly categorized into the following types:
Browser Compatibility: Ensures the application works consistently across different browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, etc.
Operating System Compatibility: Verifies performance on various OS platforms such as Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS.
Device Compatibility: Ensures that mobile apps work well on different devices with varied screen resolutions and hardware specs.
Network Compatibility: Checks application behavior under different network speeds and conditions, such as 3G, 4G, Wi-Fi, or offline scenarios.
Software Compatibility: Verifies integration and performance with third-party software like plugins, drivers, or middleware.
Version Compatibility: Ensures the software works with older, current, and future versions of systems or components (also known as forward and backward compatibility).
Steps Involved in Manual Compatibility Testing
Requirement Analysis: Identify the compatibility requirements—browsers, OS versions, devices, etc.
Test Environment Setup: Manually install or configure the environments required for testing.
Test Case Creation: Create test cases specific to compatibility, such as layout checks or feature behavior under different conditions.
Test Execution: Manually execute test cases across the targeted environments.
Defect Reporting: Log issues like layout distortion, font problems, misaligned elements, or unexpected behavior.
Re-Testing: After defects are fixed, re-run tests to ensure the application now behaves correctly.
Common Issues Found in Compatibility Testing
UI misalignment or overlapping elements
Broken links or unresponsive buttons
Different font rendering across browsers
Media (images/videos) not loading on certain devices
Features not supported or behaving differently
Application crashes or slow performance
Benefits of Compatibility Testing
Reaches a wider audience by supporting more environments
Reduces the risk of negative user experience due to unsupported setups
Ensures consistent functionality and UI/UX across platforms
Prevents revenue loss caused by inaccessible or broken interfaces
Manual vs. Automated Compatibility Testing
While tools like BrowserStack or CrossBrowserTesting exist for automating compatibility checks, manual compatibility testing is still essential for validating real-user scenarios, especially those that require visual validation or tactile feedback (like gestures on mobile).
Conclusion
Compatibility Testing ensures that your software is robust and adaptable across diverse user environments. In today’s fragmented device and OS landscape, this testing is essential for guaranteeing accessibility, usability, and performance. For manual testers, it’s about being meticulous, organized, and having access to a variety of test environments to catch real-world issues before end users do.